Skip to main content
Department of Justice Department of Justice An Roinn Dlí agus Cirt Männystrie O tha Laa

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Topics
  • Publications
  • Consultations
  • Contact

Translation help

Translate this page

Select a language

  • Arabic — عربي
  • Chinese (Simplified) — 中文简体
  • Chinese (Traditional) — 中文繁體
  • Dutch — Nederlands
  • Filipino — Filipino
  • French — Français
  • German — Deutsch
  • Hungarian — Magyar
  • Irish — Gaeilge
  • Italian — Italiano
  • Latvian — Latviešu
  • Lithuanian — Lietuvių kalba
  • Polish — Polski
  • Portuguese — Português
  • Romanian — Română
  • Russian — Русский
  • Slovak — Slovenčina
  • Spanish — Español
  • Ukrainian — Українська
  • Closed consultation Consultation on judicial pensions proposed response to McCloud

    Topics:
    • Justice and the law

    Consultation closed Consultation opened 14 October 2020, 9.00 am and closed 9 December 2020, 5.00 pm

    Summary

    This consultation outlines the proposed remedy to the McCloud case.

    Documents

    • NI judicial pensions propsed response to McCloud Adobe PDF (2 MB)

    Help viewing documents

    Consultation description

    In McCloud1 the Court of Appeal held that transitional protections provided to older judges as part of the 2015 judicial pension reforms constituted unlawful direct age discrimination. From 1 April 2015, younger judges had been moved from their legacy schemes, the Judicial Pension Scheme 1993 (JUPRA) or the fee-paid equivalent, Fee-paid Judicial Pension Scheme 2015 (FPJPS),2 both of which were tax-unregistered final salary schemes, to various tax-registered career average schemes with lower accrual rates, including to the Northern Ireland Judicial Pension Scheme 2015 (NIJPS). Judges closest to retirement were protected from the changes due to their age, and remained in JUPRA. The Court held that such protection unlawfully discriminated against younger judges.
    The Government’s request for permission to appeal to the Supreme Court was rejected and the case was remitted to the Employment Tribunal to agree a remedy for claimants. The Employment Tribunal has since made declarations that claimant judges are entitled to be members of JUPRA/FPJPS from 1 April 2015.
    The Government accepted that the Court of Appeal’s judgment had implications for all public service pension schemes that were reformed in 2015, as all contained transitional protections for older members. It has since committed to addressing the discrimination for all affected public servants regardless of whether they brought a claim.
    Rulings of the Court of Appeal in England and Wales are not directly binding here as this is a separate legal jurisdiction. However the devolved public service schemes in Northern Ireland incorporate the same transitional protection arrangements as the schemes in Britain. Legal advice confirms the implications of the Appeal Court decision is such that all schemes must be treated as affected by the McCloud decisions and so require to be remedied.

    • Summary of Responses

    Ways to respond

    Consultation closed — responses are no longer being accepted.

    Share this page Share on Facebook (external link opens in a new window / tab) Share on X (external link opens in a new window / tab) Share by email (external link opens in a new window / tab)

    Department footer links

    • Crown copyright
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy
    • Cookies
    • Accessibility
    • The Northern Ireland Executive
    • The Executive Office
    • Department of Agriculture, Environment and Rural Affairs
    • Department for Communities
    • Department for Education
    • Department for the Economy
    • Department of Finance
    • Department for Infrastructure
    • Department for Health
    • Department of Justice
    • nidirect.gov.uk — the official government website for Northern Ireland citizens